Questions and Answers Landmark Surveying Contact Us Landmark Surveying
Home Landmark Surveying Services Landmark Surveying Our Company Landmark Surveying Why Survey Landmark Surveying

Survey Related
Court Cases

  SURVEY RELATED COURT CASES:  
  CASES:  
     
  95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7642, Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,066 (Cal.App. 1 Dist. 1995)
Subject: Easements,
 
     
  96 Corp. v. Mester, 634 NYS 2d 843 (1995)
Subject: Easements,
 
     
 

A:

 
 

 
  Abar v. Rogers, 13 Cal. App. 3d 506 (Civ. No 28694 Court of Appeals of California, First Appellant Dist, Division One. February 15, 1972.)
Subject: Adverse possession of public lands,
 
     
  Abbs v. Town of Syracuse, 655 N.E. 2d 114 (Ind. App. 1995)
Subject: Easements,
 
     
  Adams v. Crews, 105 So. 2d 584; 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2534
Subject:
 
     
  Adams v. Orance Realty Sales, 1938, 134 Fla. 175, 183 So. 621; 136 Fla. 844, 187 So. 625
Subject:
 
     
  Addis v. Hoagland, 1942, 150 Fla. 694, 8 So. 2d 655
Subject:
 
     
  Agrico Chemical Co. v. State Department of Enviromental Regulation, 365 So. 2d 759, 762 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) Subject:  
     
  A. Hamburger & Sons, Inc v. Lemboeck, 20 Cal. App. 2d 565
Subject: Easements,
 
     
  Akers v. Baril, 2 N.W. 2d 791, 794 Mich. 1942
Subject:
 
     
  Akin v. Godwin, 49 So. 2d 604, 609 Fla. 1950
Subject: Boundaries, Fences,
 
     
 

Airport Park Salt Lake City v. 42 Hotel SLC, 2016 UT App 137
Subject: Private easements, Roads, Terms of writings,

 
     
  Alden v. Pinney, 12 Fla. 348
Subject:
 
     
 

Alexy v. Salvador, 630 N.Y.S. 2d 133 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept. 1995)
Subject: Easements,

 
     
  ____________________________________________________________________________  
     
  Page _1_ _2_ _3_  
     

 

Home Services Our Company Why Survey? Q & A Contact Us
Facebook Landmark Surveying LinkedIn Landmark Surveying