Questions and Answers Landmark Surveying Contact Us Landmark Surveying
Home Landmark Surveying Services Landmark Surveying Our Company Landmark Surveying Why Survey Landmark Surveying

Survey Related
Court Cases

  SURVEY RELATED COURT CASES:  
  CASES:  
 

B:

 
 

 
  Bacon v. Kimwell,14 Mich. 281
Subject:
 
     
  Beader v. Jennings, 40 Federal Reporter 199
Subject:
 
     
  Baer v. Moran, 153 U.S. 287
Subject:
 
     
  Bailey v. Hagler, Case No. 90-1291, Court of Appeals of Flordia, First District, 575 So. 2d 679, January 25, 1999, Filed, Rehearing Denied March 27, 1991, Review Denied August 28, 1991.
Subject: Adverse possession,
 
     
  Baker v. Niess, No. BI-405, Court of Appeals of Florida, First District, 496 So.2d 215, October 21, 1986, Filed.
Subject: Adverse possession, Acquiescence,
 
     
  Baki v. Kelly, Unpublished January 29, 2002, No. 226780, Genesee Circuit Court, LC No. 95-040507-CH, State of Michigan Court of Appeals,
Subject: Adverse Possession, Easement by prescription, Acquiescence,
 
     
  Baird v. Campbell, 67 N.Y. App. Div. 104
Subject:
 
     
  Balestrieri v. Sullivan, 142 Cal.App. 2d 332,
Subject: Easements,
 
     
  Ball v. Stephens, 158 P.2d 207, 209 Cal.Ct.App. 1945
Subject: Public highway establishment,
 
     
  Ballard v. Stanolind Oil and Gas Col, 80 F. 2d 588 (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Dec 10, 1935)
Subject: Long possession, Trace footsteps of original surveyor, Fence as boundaries, Boundary by acquiescence,
 
     
  Ballou v. O'Brien, 20 Mich. 304
Subject:
 
     
  Baltzell v. McKinnon, 57 Fla. 355, 49 So.Rep. 546
Subject:
 
     
  Bank of Augusta v. Earle, 13 Peters, 595
Subject:
 
     
  Banks v. Ogden, 2 Wall. (U.S.) 57, text 67
Subject:
 
     
  ____________________________________________________________________________  
  Page _1_ _2_ _3_ _4_ _5_  
     

 

Home Services Our Company Why Survey? Q & A Contact Us
Facebook Landmark Surveying LinkedIn Landmark Surveying