Questions and Answers

	SURVEY RELATED COURT CASES:

	Page _1_ _2_ _3_ _4_ _5_ _6_		Index

	C:

	Citizens for Covenant Compliance v. Anderson, 12 Cal. 4th 345 (1995), 47 Cal.Rptr. 2d 898, 906 P. 2d 1314, Subject: Easements,

	City of Burlingame v. County of San Mateo, 90 Cal.App. 2d 705, Subject: Common boundary, Adjoiner,

	City of Chicago v. Illinois Cent. R. Co., 146 U.S. 387, 13 Sup.Ct.Rep. 110, Subject:

	City of Denver v. Bayer, 2 P. 6, Subject: Exercise of government power as to takings,

	City of Denver v. Bergland, 695 F.2d 465 (1982), Subject: RS2477 Roads,

	City of Eustis v. Firster, 113 So. 2d 260, Subject:

	City of Jacksonville v. Basnett, 20 Fla. 525, Subject:

	City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior Court (Farquhar), 13 Cal. 4th 232 (1996), 52 Cal Rptr. 2d 82, 914 P. 2d 160 [No. S032448 Apr. 25, 1996], Subject: Railroad, Easement, Deeds, Intent of parties,

	City of New Orleans v. Paine, 147 U.S. 261 (1893), Subject: Arpents, Vested rights, Prior surveys,

	City of Racine v. Emerson, 85 Wis. 80, 55 N.W. 177, Subject: Boundaries, Ancient fences, Street boundaries, Original survey stakes of streets and lots,

	City of Redlands v. Nickerson, 188 Cal.App. 2d 118 (1961), Subjects: Ambiguity in deeds,

	City of Tarpon Springs v. Smith, 81 Fla. 479, 88 So. 613, Subject:

	City of Torrance v. Superior Court, 16 Cal. 3d 195 [L.A. No. 30507 Supreme Court of California February 20, 1976), Subject: Eminent domain, Abandonment,

	City of West Palm Beach v. Internal Improvement Trust Fund - 1998, 714 So. 2d 1060, Subject:

	____________________________________________________________________________
	Page _1_ _2_ _3_ _4_ _5_ _6_		Index