| SURVEY RELATED COURT CASES: | ||||
| Page _1_ _2_ _3_ _4_ _5_ _6_ | Index | |||
B: |
||||
| Bender v. Pitzer, 27 Pa. St 335, Subject: Hearsay rules and deceased surveyor's statements, |
||||
| Bennett v. Tarrant County Water Control and Imp. Dist. No.one, S.W. 2d 441 (Tex.App. -Fort Worth 1995) Subject: Easements, |
||||
| Berg v. Ting, 125 Wash, 2d 544, 886 P. 2d 564 (Wash. 1995) Subject: Easements, |
||||
| Berg v. Ting, 125 Wash. 2d 544, 886 P. 2d 564 (Wash. 1995) Subject Easements, |
||||
| Bernal v. Gleim, 33 Cal. 669 (1867) Subject: Color of title, |
||||
| Berryman v. Hotel Savoy Co., 160 Cal. 559, 566; 117 P. 677, 37 L.R.A. (N.S.) 5; Subject: Deeds, Intentions identified by deeds, |
||||
| Beverage v. Canton Placer Mining Co., 43 Cal, 2d 769, Subject: Descriptions, Identification of property, |
||||
| Biedermann v. Wasatch County, 2015 UT App 274, Subject: Special Service District, Brighton estates, |
||||
| Billingsley v. Bates, 30 Alta. 376 , 68 Am. Dec. 126, 1857 WL. 385 (Ala.), Subject: Original monuments are established by law and control, Subsequent surveys do not change original survey, |
||||
| Bittner v. Walsh, No. B-314 District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, Sept. 7, 1961, Subject: |
||||
| Blackmore v. L&D Development Inc, 20 UT App 130, Subject: Real estate development contracts, |
||||
| Blackwood v. Brown, 29 Mich. 483, Subject: |
||||
| Blackwood v. Van Vleet, 11 Mich. 252, Subject: Boundaries no matter for court of equity, |
||||
| Blake v. Doherty, 18 U.S. 359 (U.S. Supreme Court 1820) Subject: Grant descriptions, Natural objects, Extrinsic testimony and descriptions, Plats as evidence, |
||||
| ____________________________________________________________________________ | ||||
| Page _1_ _2_ _3_ _4_ _5_ _6_ | Index | |||
| Home | Services | Our Company | Why Survey? | Q & A | Contact Us |
|---|
