Questions and Answers Landmark Surveying Contact Us Landmark Surveying
Home Landmark Surveying Services Landmark Surveying Our Company Landmark Surveying Why Survey Landmark Surveying

Survey Related
Court Cases

  SURVEY RELATED COURT CASES:  
     
  Page _1_ _2_ _3_ _4_ _5_ _6_   Index  
     
 

B:

 
  Block v. North Dakota ex rel. Board of University and School Lands, 461 U.S. 273, 280, 103 S.Ct 1811, 1816, 75 L.Ed 2d 849 (1983)
Subject:
 
 

 
  Boardman v. Lessees of Reed, 6 Pet. 328, 341,
Subject: Hearsay rules and boundaries,
 
     
  Bodiford v. Spanish Oak Farms Inc., 455 S.E. 2d 194 (S.C.App. 1995)
Subject:
 
     
  Bodley v. Taylor, 5 Id. 919,
Subject: Status of title issued prior to patent,
 
     
  Bogy v. Rogers, CA01-936, March 6, 2002, NO. E-99-127
Subject: Acquiescence,
 
     
  Botes v. Illinois Central Rail Road, 1 Black 204,
Subject:
 
     
  Bowman v. Sanborn, 5 Foster (N.H.) 87,
Subject:
 
     
  Bradley v. N.Y. & N.H. Railway, 21 Conn. 294,
Subject:
 
     
  Brand v. Damroy, 19 Am.Dec. 176,
Subject: Sufficiency of deeds, Course missing,
 
     
  Breakey v. Woolsey, 149 Mich. 86, 112 N.W. 719, Den.ex.dem.,
Subject: Boundaries, Fences built by survey stakes, Latter surveys, Agreements,
 
     
  Brewer v. Flankey, 660 So. 2d 761, 20 Fla.L. Weekly D1952 (Fla.App. 5 Dist. 1995),
Subject: Easements,
 
     
  Brickel v. Trammel, 77 Fla. 544, 82 So. 221, 1919 Fla. LEXIS 694,
Subject:
 
     
  Bridger v. Lake, 271 Mont. 186, 896 P. 2d 406 (Mont. 1995)
Subject: Easements,
 
     
  Broward v. Mabry, 58 Fla. 398, 50 South. Rep. 826
Subject:
 
     
  Brown v. Avery, 63 Fla. 355, 58 So. Rep. 34,
Subject:
 
  ____________________________________________________________________________  
     
  Page _1_ _2_ _3_ _4_ _5_ _6_   Index  

 

Home Services Our Company Why Survey? Q & A Contact Us
Facebook Landmark Surveying LinkedIn Landmark Surveying